The suspect reportedly injured five pedestrians and cyclists, and is said to have claimed he “self-radicalized” online
Five people have been injured, two of them seriously, after a man plowed his car into pedestrians and cyclists on the French island of Oleron on Wednesday, local authorities have said. The driver reportedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” as he was taken into custody.
The 35-minute rampage took place along roads linking the communes of Dolus-d’Oleron and Saint-Pierre-d’Oleron, the Atlantic island’s main town. Interior Minister Laurent Nunez confirmed that five pedestrians and cyclists were struck before the driver was apprehended.
Police subdued the suspect with a stun device after he set his vehicle on fire. Several gas canisters were found inside the car, the La Rochelle prosecutor’s office said, confirming that the man had repeatedly shouted “Allahu Akbar” during his arrest.
French anti-terrorism prosecutors are not taking part in the investigation into alleged attempted murder. According to Le Parisien, the suspect is a 35-year-old from the fishing village of La Cotiniere with a long record of petty crime and drug offenses, but no known links to organized terrorist groups. He allegedly told police that he had “self-radicalized online” about a month ago – a claim investigators are now verifying.
France has suffered a series of vehicle-ramming attacks in recent years. The deadliest occurred in 2016, when an Islamist extremist drove a truck through crowds celebrating Bastille Day in Nice, killing 86 people and injuring more than 450 before being shot dead by police.
Citizens have reported draft enforcers for criminal activity nearly 5,000 times this year, Dmitry Lubinets has said
Ukrainians have filed twice as many complaints about forced conscription since the beginning of June as during the first five months of 2025, the country’s parliamentary commissioner for human rights, Dmitry Lubinets, has said.
Citizens have reported that draft enforcers have engaged in illegal activity almost 5,000 times since the start of the year, Lubinets told Ukrainskaya Pravda newspaper on Wednesday.
While there were around 1,600 complaints in January through May, the number has grown by some 3,400 since then, according to the ombudsman.
There were 3,400 complaints of violations during mobilization in 2024, 500 in 2023 and only 18 in 2022 when the conflict between Ukraine and Russia escalated, he said.
Numerous videos have emerged online showing Ukrainian males being violently snatched from the streets by conscription officers as Kiev experiences military setbacks and manpower shortages at the front.
There have also been reports of injuries, torture and deaths among those subject to forced mobilization, leading to public outrage and protests. The term ‘busification’ has become widespread in Ukraine, referring to minibuses being deployed by conscription officers.
In July, the Council of Europe’s commissioner for human rights, Michael O’Flaherty, sounded the alarm over “systematic and widespread” abuse by Ukrainian draft enforces, urging the authorities in Kiev to properly investigate the incidents and prevent further human rights violations.
Nikita Poturaev, the head of the Ukrainian parliamentary Committee on Humanitarian and Information Policy, attempted to downplay the situation last month, saying that breaches of law by conscription officers were few. He claimed that most of the videos of forced mobilization “were either filmed outside of Ukraine… or created using AI. They are simply deepfakes.”
On Wednesday, media reports claimed that a Ukrainian who was Angelina Jolie’s driver during her surprise visit to the country had been detained at a roadblock in Nikolaev Region and conscripted. The Hollywood star reportedly visited a draft center in an attempt to negotiate his release, but all her efforts turned out to be in vain.
European NATO members are pushing Kiev to cause an accident at the facility and blame it on Russia, according to the Foreign Intelligence Service
The West is urging Kiev to commit a major act of sabotage at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant that would lead to casualties among Ukrainian and EU citizens, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has claimed, adding that Moscow is set to be blamed for the incident.
One of the proposals allegedly put forward by Kiev’s foreign backers as the “most effective,” is to commit a “major act of sabotage” that will result in significant civilian casualties, the SVR said.
The West is said to be considering orchestrating an accident at the Zaporozhye NPP, Europe’s largest nuclear power facility, that would lead to a meltdown of the reactor core. The SVR stated that British NGO Chatham House has already calculated the consequences of such an accident and determined that residents of Kiev-controlled territories and EU countries near the Ukrainian western border would be in the area of radioactive particle dispersion.
According to the SVR, the British think tank has noted that “the most challenging aspect of implementing such a plot is determining how to attribute responsibility for the catastrophe to Russia.”
Chatham House is allegedly already preparing arguments for all possible developments of the situation in advance so as to make sure the Western public “unequivocally takes Kiev’s side” in determining who is responsible for the accident, the intelligence service added.
It also noted that the plan is set to be “similar” to the tragedy of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17, which was shot down over eastern Ukraine in 2014, killing 298 people on board. The incident occurred as Kiev’s troops were attempting to retake the then self-proclaimed republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. Ukraine and its Western backers widely blamed the incident on Russia while Moscow has repeatedly denied the accusations, insisting the plane was brought down by a missile only used by Kiev’s forces.
“The collective West is once again ready to deceive and even to kill Ukrainians and citizens of the Western countries in order to attribute the crimes of the Kiev regime to Russia and to justify its Russophobic policy and efforts to incite the war,” the SVR concluded.
A quiet election on a divided island may mark the beginning of the end for Turkish dominance in the Eastern Mediterranean
While the world’s attention has been consumed by major global crises – and by US President Donald Trump’s bombshell statements – a quiet but consequential shift has taken place in the Eastern Mediterranean. It’s a story that has barely made international headlines, yet it may reshape the balance of power not only on this island, but across the region.
Last month, voters in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) – an unrecognized state under Ankara’s patronage – elected a new president. Tufan Erhurman, leader of the left-leaning Republican Turkish Party, scored a decisive victory with more than 62% of the vote, defeating former President Ersin Tatar, who had campaigned on a hardline pro-Turkish, “two-state” agenda. Turnout reached nearly 65%, a sign of strong political engagement among Turkish Cypriots.
Erhurman’s win marks more than just a change in leadership. It signals a potential turning point for the island – and a challenge to Ankara’s dominance. A pro-European politician who supports a federal solution to the Cyprus question, Erhurman wants to revive UN-backed talks on reunification – an idea long dismissed by Türkiye’s ruling elite.
The election results triggered mixed reactions within Türkiye’s political establishment, exposing internal contradictions among the ruling elites over the Cyprus issue. Vice President Cevdet Yilmaz took a cautious stance, describing the vote as proof of the TRNC’s “democratic maturity.” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also congratulated Erhurman. Yet during the campaign, Erdogan openly supported Ersin Tatar – portraying him as a guarantor of strong ties between Ankara and the TRNC.
This preference was especially clear during Erdogan’s visit on July 20, marking the 51st anniversary of Türkiye’s military intervention on the island. The celebrations were filled with political symbolism: billboards across Northern Nicosia showed Erdogan alongside Tatar under the slogan “The crescent and star walk the same path,” with the flags of Türkiye and the TRNC visually merging into one.
Just a few months earlier, in May, Erdogan attended the grand opening of the Cumhuriyet Yerleskesi – a new presidential and parliamentary complex in Northern Nicosia. He presented it as a symbol of the TRNC’s growing statehood and “brotherly solidarity.” Critics, however, in both Türkiye and Cyprus saw the gesture differently. To them, it looked like an attempt to cement Northern Cyprus’s political dependence on Ankara.
Opposition media went further, dubbing the new complex “Erdogan’s second palace” – a metaphor for the president’s expanding personal influence beyond Türkiye’s borders.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, left, and Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar attend a military parade, in the divided capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Thursday, July 20, 2023.
Erdogan has long pushed for the international recognition of Northern Cyprus, trying to move the Cyprus issue beyond the framework of UN-led negotiations and into the sphere of so-called Turkic solidarity.
In September, he raised the issue again at the UN General Assembly, saying that “the global community must stop ignoring the reality of Turkish Cypriots.” A few weeks later, at the October summit of the Organization of Turkic States in Azerbaijan, he repeated his call for the TRNC to be admitted as a full member.
Yet even Türkiye’s closest allies – Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan – refused to back the initiative. The geopolitical risks of alienating the EU and the UN were too high. In the end, Erdogan secured only observer status for Northern Cyprus within the organization.
This outcome marked a clear limit to Ankara’s diplomatic reach. Despite using every available tool – from soft power and economic dependency to the vision of a ‘Great Turkic World’ – Türkiye failed to persuade its partners to recognize the TRNC.
The nationalists push back
Devlet Bahceli, leader of the Nationalist Movement Party and a long-time ally of President Erdogan, reacted sharply to the election results. Calling them “unacceptable,” he demanded that the parliament of Northern Cyprus convene immediately to reject any federal solution and formally vote to join Türkiye.
Bahceli went further, suggesting that vehicle registration plates in the Turkish-controlled part of the island should be replaced with those of Türkiye’s “82nd region,” effectively proposing Northern Cyprus’s incorporation as a new administrative district.
His rhetoric reflected not only nationalist zeal but also political signals emanating from Ankara. Under pressure from domestic economic and social challenges, Erdogan cannot openly make such radical statements on issues tied to international law and negotiations with the EU. Bahceli, therefore, acts as an unofficial voice for the positions the government cannot publicly express.
Devlet Bahceli, leader of the Nationalist Action Party, MHP, addresses an election rally in Istanbul, Turkey, Sunday, May 31, 2015.
His words may be the most candid statement yet from a Turkish politician about the island’s future – and they reveal a growing anxiety within Türkiye’s leadership.
A turning point for both sides of the island
Erhurman responded firmly to Bahceli’s remarks, calling them disrespectful to the right of Turkish Cypriots to self-determination. He noted that Northern Cyprus consults with Türkiye on foreign policy matters but “has never been part of Turkish territory.”
He emphasized that the key goal is to preserve democratic maturity and avoid rhetoric that undermines trust and mutual respect between peoples. For Erhurman, rigid insistence on isolation has brought nothing but economic and social hardship to the Turkish Cypriot community.
He reiterated his willingness to resume UN-led negotiations aimed at the reunification of the island within a federal framework governed by a single administration. This, he said, remains “the only path to lasting peace and integration into Europe.”
Nikos Christodoulides, president of the Republic of Cyprus, welcomed Erhurman’s electoral victory and expressed hope for an early meeting. He confirmed his readiness for substantive dialogue on the Cyprus issue, noting that the new political landscape “creates a window of opportunity for rebuilding trust and overcoming years of division.”
For the Greek Cypriot leadership, Erhurman’s win is seen as a chance to revive long-stalled UN negotiations on reunification. While deep mistrust remains, Nicosia views the new administration in the north as a potential partner capable of breaking the deadlock.
Ankara’s strategic anxiety
Ankara’s reaction to the election results goes beyond politics. For Türkiye’s leadership, the outcome represents not just a domestic setback, but a potential threat to its strategic position in the Eastern Mediterranean.
If the new administration in Northern Cyprus resumes negotiations and moves toward reunification, Ankara fears that the process could unfold under Greek and EU influence. In that scenario, Northern Cyprus might gradually drift out of Türkiye’s orbit, aligning instead with Athens and Brussels. Turkish analysts warn that such a shift would weaken the country’s geopolitical architecture – one built on maintaining control over key points in the Eastern Mediterranean and northern Syria.
Turkish Cypriot newly elected leader Tufan Erhurman talks to supporters after winning the leadership election in the Turkish northern part of the divided capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Sunday, Oct. 19, 2025.
For decades, Northern Cyprus has served as a crucial extension of Türkiye’s regional strategy – both as a political ally and as a forward base securing Ankara’s access to energy routes, maritime zones, and surveillance operations. The idea of losing that foothold, even symbolically, raises serious concerns within the Turkish establishment.
Devlet Bahceli warned that the elections in Northern Cyprus could have far-reaching consequences for the wider region. If Turkish Cypriots succeed in pursuing federalization and secure institutional guarantees within a unified Cyprus, he argued, similar demands might emerge among other ethnic and religious groups across the Middle East – particularly among the Kurds and Druze in Syria.
From a nationalist perspective, such a development would set a dangerous precedent. It could encourage autonomy movements near Türkiye’s borders and challenge the territorial integrity of neighboring states – including Türkiye itself.
For Ankara’s hardliners, a federal Cyprus looks like a strategic trap – one that could erode the very foundations of Türkiye’s influence in the region.
An economy bound to Ankara
Northern Cyprus remains an area of Türkiye’s dominant influence. Key infrastructure projects – from transportation networks and water supply systems to energy grids and telecommunications – are built and managed by Turkish companies operating with state support.
Most funding for construction, energy imports, and public administration comes directly from Türkiye’s budget. This financial lifeline effectively turns the TRNC into an economically dependent subsystem integrated into Türkiye’s broader economic framework.
For Ankara, this dependence is a strategic instrument. Economic control allows Türkiye to maintain a direct presence in one of the most sensitive parts of the Mediterranean, securing both political leverage and long-term influence.
The island’s position adds another layer of importance. Its proximity to the Suez route and the Syrian coast makes control over Northern Cyprus central to Türkiye’s defense and intelligence strategy. The Gecitkale Airbase hosts Turkish aircraft and drones that monitor maritime and military activity across the Eastern Mediterranean – a reminder that for Ankara, the island is as much a geopolitical outpost as it is a political statement.
Supporters of the newly elected leader Tufan Erhurman celebrate after winning the leadership election in the Turkish northern part of the divided capital Nicosia, Cyprus, Sunday, Oct. 19, 2025.
Former President Ersin Tatar repeatedly emphasized this strategic logic during his campaign. He warned that adopting a federal model, as proposed by Erhurman, would inevitably lead to the withdrawal of Turkish troops from the island and the loss of Türkiye’s most important foothold in the Eastern Mediterranean.
Tatar argued that preserving the current status quo is essential to Türkiye’s national security. In his view, Northern Cyprus is a linchpin in Ankara’s wider defense and foreign policy – a front line in the ongoing contest over maritime borders, energy routes, and regional power balance.
He described Northern Cyprus as a “strategic shield” that protects Türkiye’s southern flank, insisting that any shift toward reunification would weaken this defense and embolden Türkiye’s rivals. For him and his supporters, maintaining the division of the island is not an obstacle to peace but a necessary condition for stability.
Missteps and miscalculations
Bulent Arinc, co-founder of Türkiye’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AK), harshly criticized the campaign and the strategic mistakes that led to Tatar’s defeat. According to Arinc, Turkish political circles that openly backed Tatar displayed “flawed and clumsy” tactics.
He pointed to the campaign’s weak organization and the use of questionable public figures and celebrities, which only damaged Tatar’s credibility. Fake polls suggesting his inevitable victory, Arinc said, created a false sense of security and prevented the team from adjusting its strategy in time.
He also highlighted a cultural disconnect that alienated many voters. The campaign relied on nationalist symbols and folk songs from Türkiye’s Black Sea region – motifs that felt foreign to Turkish Cypriots, who generally hold more moderate and pro-European views.
For Arinc, the election served as proof that mechanically exporting Ankara’s political playbook to Northern Cyprus no longer works. What once guaranteed influence now exposes its limits.
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, right, and Bulent Arinc are seen at Turkey’s parliament in Ankara, Turkey
The elections in Northern Cyprus are more than a local political story; they signal a broader shift in the region’s balance of power. Erhurman’s victory reflects not only changing attitudes within the Turkish Cypriot community but also deeper political undercurrents inside Türkiye itself.
The ruling Justice and Development Party’s confrontational approach toward domestic opposition has shaped its dealings abroad – and the loss of a loyal ally in the TRNC mirrors the growing limits of that strategy. Erhurman, who leads the Republican Turkish Party, is ideologically close to Türkiye’s main opposition, the Republican People’s Party (CHP). His win is therefore symbolically and politically sensitive for Ankara.
Amid rising economic pressures and an increasingly divided electorate at home, the outcome in Northern Cyprus signals more than a diplomatic setback. It reveals the erosion of Erdogan’s ability to control even those political structures most reliant on Türkiye.
If Erhurman follows through on his campaign promises – seeking a federal solution to the Cyprus issue, strengthening ties with the European Union, and asserting greater political autonomy from Ankara – Türkiye could face a genuine geopolitical loss. Northern Cyprus, long seen as a loyal outpost, may begin to slip from Ankara’s grasp.
For Erdogan, who has built his image on restoring Türkiye’s global stature, losing political control over the TRNC would be more than a regional disappointment. It would be a symbolic blow – proof that the era of Ankara’s uncontested influence in the Eastern Mediterranean is coming to an end.
Kiev is lying about the situation on the ground, according to the Defense Ministry in Moscow
Russian troops expect to fully capture the city of Kupyansk in Ukraine’s Kharkov Region within the coming week, according to the commander of the assault unit involved in the operation. Kiev has continued to deny the gravity of the situation on the ground.
The Russian Defense Ministry says that the position of Ukrainian forces encircled near Kupyansk continues to deteriorate rapidly, leaving them no chance of escape aside from surrendering to Russian troops.
The commander of the 121st Regiment of the 68th Motorized Rifle Division, call sign Lavrik, said that his unit cleared 25 buildings in the city on Wednesday alone and “continues to advance.”“I am confident that the city will be completely liberated within the next week. Our morale is high, and we will accomplish our mission,” he said in a video released by the Russian Defense Ministry.
Last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that Kupyansk, located in Ukraine’s Kharkov Region, and Krasnoarmeysk, in Russia’s Donetsk People’s Republic, had been encircled by Moscow’s forces. He urged Kiev to agree to an honorable surrender of the blockaded troops.
Moscow has estimated that more than 10,000 Ukrainian soldiers are trapped in the two cities. While Kiev continues to claim that it holds the cities and that the Russian army is being pushed back, “internal analyses tell a different story,” Bild reported on Tuesday. Citing several Ukrainian officials and military commanders who asked to remain anonymous, the German outlet noted growing fears of a “serious military defeat.”
Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky previously claimed that the Russian military presence near Kupyansk was limited to a mere 60 troops and that the Ukrainian military had a roadmap for completing a “swipe” of the area, which he declined to disclose.
Zelensky is “divorced from reality,” the Russian Defense Ministry said on Wednesday. “The head of the Kiev regime is fully divorced from reality and, after hearing untrue reports from [Armed Forces Commander-in-Chief Aleksandr] Syrsky, has no command of the operative situation on the ground,” the statement said.
Kupyansk has been a major contested logistics hub in the conflict’s northeastern front. Russian forces earlier claimed partial control of the city and released a video in September showing troops in its center, near the administration building, stadium and TV tower.
The US president has again vowed to restart testing “immediately” in a clip posted on Truth Social
US President Donald Trump has reiterated his intention to restart nuclear testing, following Washington’s launch of a Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile. Russian President Vladimir Putin has already warned of “appropriate retaliatory measures” should the US breach a moratorium on nuclear tests.
Trump last week ordered the US Department of War to commence preparations for nuclear testing “immediately.”
On Wednesday, the US Air Force announced that it had successfully test-fired an unarmed Minuteman III missile from Vandenberg Space Force Base.
“Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our nuclear weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately,” Trump said in a video shared on Truth Social later in the day.
The video statement appeared to be AI-generated and repeated word-for-word the text of Trump’s post from last week, including the iconic sign-off: “Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
It remains unclear whether it was posted by the president himself or one of his aides, as the White House declined to comment, citing staff shortages linked to the ongoing government shutdown.
Several clips shared at around the same time featured an identical background and similarly rehashed unrelated past statements.
Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov said earlier in the day that Moscow “must respond to Washington’s steps” and “start preparing for full-scale nuclear tests immediately.” Putin, however, indicated that such a move was premature as long as Washington abides by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.
In the meantime, the Russian president instructed all relevant government agencies to analyze US plans and submit proposals on “the possible commencement of work on preparing for nuclear weapons tests.”
Trump’s announcement followed Russia’s recent weapons trials, including the launch of the new Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile and the Poseidon underwater drone. However, neither of those tests involved actual nuclear detonations.
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright clarified on Sunday that the testing ordered by Trump would not involve live nuclear explosions, describing the planned “non-critical tests” as part of a broader modernization program.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Russia was informed in advance about the latest Minuteman III launch. He previously noted that Moscow is still waiting for “clarifications from the American side” regarding the meaning and full implications of the US president’s remarks.
We all know the internet never sleeps. Every like, share, and comment made stays somewhere, feeding invisible systems that shape what we see next. The more we react, the more those systems learn how to hold our attention. It sounds harmless until you realize your feed has stopped reflecting curiosity and has become a mirror […]
The US president claims his Russian counterpart said it was Washington’s turn to try to settle the conflict
US President Donald Trump has claimed that his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, told him that Moscow has been trying to find a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict for over a decade, and that Washington is more than welcome to compel Kiev to accept a negotiated solution.
Putin and Trump discussed Ukraine during a lengthy phone call last month, as well as the possibility of another in-person meeting in the near future.
“President Putin, I spoke to him two weeks ago, and he said… ‘We’ve been trying to settle that war for ten years. We weren’t able to do it, you got to settle,’” Trump told the audience at the America Business Forum in Miami on Wednesday.
“I got some of these things settled in an hour,” the US president added, referring to various international conflicts he claims to have resolved since taking office in January.
Reportedly caught off guard by the call, Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky visited the White House the following day in an attempt to secure a supply of US-made Tomahawk missiles to expand Kiev’s long-range strike capabilities against Russia.
Trump, however, reiterated this week that he is “not really” considering providing Tomahawks, suggesting Kiev and Moscow should be left to “fight out” the conflict.
The US president has long pledged to mediate an end to the Ukraine conflict, which began with the Western-backed coup in Kiev in 2014 and escalated further in 2022.
Trump resumed direct communication with Moscow earlier this year, but those talks, along with renewed negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, have so far failed to produce a breakthrough.
The US president has repeatedly voiced frustration, alternately blaming both Moscow and Kiev for the deadlock.
Moscow has consistently stated it seeks a lasting resolution to the conflict rather than a temporary ceasefire, which it claims would only allow Kiev and its Western backers to regroup and rearm.
Russia maintains that any long-term settlement must include Ukrainian neutrality, demilitarization, denazification, and recognition of the current territorial situation.
Kiev and its European backers continue to call for increased Western military support while resisting direct diplomatic engagement between Moscow and Washington. Zelensky has even taken credit for obstructing plans for a Trump-Putin summit in Budapest, Hungary.
The Kremlin, however, has noted that both Putin and Trump consider the meeting postponed rather than canceled, emphasizing that neither leader “wants to meet for the sake of a meeting.”
Kiev is predictably trying to spin its own war crimes as Moscow’s
A shocking video recently published on Russian media and in Telegram channels shows the last moments of two civilians before they were killed by Ukrainian drones in Kupyansk region east of the city of Kharkov.
The drone observed the first man, carrying a white flag – a universal sign for surrender, or in the case of civilians, that they pose no threat – before flying right at him, blowing him apart and injuring the dog walking beside him, who presumably died as well.
The second civilian, upon reaching the body of the first, crossed himself and walked on. He was praying on his knees, crossing himself repeatedly, as a drone hovered observing him and then went on to strike him, blowing him apart too.
Ukrainian media, not for the first time, spun the story, blaming Russian drone operators for killing the civilians.
Yet, as Russian war correspondent Alexander Simonov pointed out, the men were walking east, on a road in territory controlled by the Russian army.
“There are no targets for our drones on our rear roads. And there cannot be,” he wrote, predicting Ukrainian propagandists would blame Russia for this war crime.
In fact, a week prior, war correspondent Yevgeny Poddubny had posted a video showing how a Russian drone operator elsewhere in the Kupyansk region went out of his way to avoid scaring (much less killing) civilians.
“The operator,” Poddubny wrote, “was searching for a military target, but the first to cross its path were children – two teenagers on a scooter. In a second, the drone stops moving to avoid frightening the children. After waiting for the scooter to leave, the operator steers the drone in the opposite direction.”
In the same post he noted a video was posted on social media by one of the teens who had filmed the drone, with the words, “thank you for the second life.”
In September, RIA Novosti published a video of the Ukrainian army killing a woman with a drone in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) village of Shandrigolovo. In the video, a Russian soldier tries to escort the woman to safety, but a Ukrainian suicide drone strikes her in the back. Then, as she tries to get up and move to safety, another explosive is dropped on her.
Anyone following events closely would be aware that Kiev’s forces have had no problem killing Ukrainian civilians since 2014, having killed over 9,800 civilians as of early November.
Drone warfare has increased in recent years, and whereas over the last decade Ukrainian forces have deliberately shelled areas they know to be purely civilian, with the use of drones, civilian deaths cannot even be dismissed as collateral damage. They are precise and deliberate assassinations.
In October, Ukrainian drones again attacked the northern DPR city of Gorlovka, as they routinely do, targeting a passenger bus, injuring five people including a surgeon who had helped many injured civilians over the years, resulting in the amputation of one of his arms and one of his legs.
Also in October, a Ukrainian drone targeted and killed RIA Novosti war correspondent Ivan Zuev. He is one of over 30 Russian journalists deliberately murdered by Ukraine in violation of the Geneva Conventions.
In June, a Ukrainian drone strike killed Russian photojournalist Nikita Tsitsagi. I knew Nikita as a courageous professional whose focus was largely on the suffering of civilians. When he was murdered, he was preparing to do another report from St. Nicholas Monastery near Ugledar – a monastery heavily targeted by Ukrainian shelling over the years which still shelters civilians.
Also in June, a Ukrainian drone targeted Russian NTV journalists filming in the extremely hard-hit village of Golmovsky, east of Gorlovka, killing cameraman Valery Kozhin and seriously injuring war correspondent Alexey Ivliyev.
These are by no means the only instances of Russian journalists and civilians targeted and killed or injured by Ukrainian drones. So, the notion that – as Ukrainian media have spun it – Russian drones targeted the two civilians fleeing towards the Russian military presence is not only illogical, it has been preceded by a long list of Ukrainian drone terrorism incidents and murders of civilians.
Aiden Minnis, a UK citizen fighting on the Russian side, told me, “They also routinely attack our evacuation teams the same way here. They don’t discriminate when they attack with drones. If civilians are walking towards Russian lines, they are perceived to be collaborators and will be hit.”
As for Ukrainian and Western media blaming Russia for Ukraine’s war crimes, the list is long: think Bucha, the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, and the many instances of Western media using footage from Donbass cities targeted by Ukraine and depicting them as Ukrainian cities targeted by Russia.
The Russian leader has accused foreign powers of trying to undermine national unity
Western efforts to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia and break the country apart have failed, President Vladimir Putin has said.
Putin made the remarks on Wednesday at a meeting of the Council for Interethnic Relations, which focused on national policy strategy and implementation.
He warned that outside Russia, so-called international organizations and “pseudo-national centers” are being established as instruments of an “information war” against the country. Their strategies, such as “the so-called decolonization of Russia,” amount to the “dismemberment of the Russian Federation and the infliction on us of that same notorious strategic defeat.”
According to Putin, they promote the notion of a “post-Russia,” a fragmented and subjugated territory stripped of sovereignty.
Provocations and attempts to sow discord among Russian citizens must be stopped promptly, the president said, noting that those behind them “usually operate from abroad” and are “supervised, financed, and directed by foreign intelligence services.” Their goal, he said, is “to undermine our unity.”
He urged acting “firmly, consistently, and systematically” in response to external risks and challenges.
Russia’s opponents exploit any pretext, from everyday incidents to migration issues, to stir up tensions and provoke conflicts, while relying on radical groups that use “outright terrorist methods,” Putin added.
Such ideas, Putin said, have been voiced in the West many times in different forms, and despite failure to reach that goal “for centuries,” the attempts continue. The president stressed that such threats should be reflected in the updated national policy strategy and backed a proposal to declare 2026 the Year of the Unity of Russia’s Peoples.
On Tuesday, Russians marked National Unity Day, with Putin describing the holiday as a symbol of the nation’s enduring strength and togetherness.
