Those with sound minds must unite against “collective madness” in the EU, the deputy head of Slovakia’s ruling Smer party has said
Bratislava could support Budapest’s idea to form an anti-Ukraine bloc within the EU, Lubos Blaha, the deputy leader of Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico’s Smer Party, has said.
Earlier this week, a senior political adviser to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban suggested that Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic could team up to align their stances ahead of European Council meetings. A “Ukraine-skeptic” alliance in the EU “will come – and be more and more visible,” Balazs Orban, told Politico.
Unlike most other EU nations, Hungary and Slovakia refused to send military aid to Kiev, instead calling for a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine conflict and maintaining ties with Russia. A similar stance had been voiced by Andrej Babis, whose ANO party won the Czech parliamentary election last month.
Blaha told Izvestia on Saturday, that “joint actions by those who still have a sound mind in Europe are not only possible, but also probable. Despite the fact that Europe is once again… gripped by a collective madness that is leading us all to war, decline and chaos.”
The policies of the EU leadership in Brussels are “harmful and anti-European,” so that Bratislava, Budapest, and Prague must defend themselves together, he argued.
The deputy head of the Smer party, which is part of the Slovak ruling coalition, noted that the positions of the three states on the Ukraine conflict are very close, despite differences on other foreign policy issues.
He warned that the “anti-Russian military hysteria” could end in disaster for the EU as “Russia cannot be defeated without unleashing a nuclear war.”
Blaha added that the sanctions against Moscow have failed and described the EU’s plan to phase out Russian energy by 2028 as “chopping down a branch on which you are sitting.”
When asked about a possible Slovak, Hungarian, and Czech alliance earlier this week, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that – considering the “crazy Russophobia” in the West – Moscow would welcome any “sensible initiative” aimed at reaching a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine crisis.
The US president previously said the gesture was “very nice” but refused to restart trade talks with Ottawa
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has confirmed that he personally apologized to US President Donald Trump for a regional government-commissioned commercial that used footage of Ronald Reagan to criticize trade tariffs.
The ad, commissioned by the government of Ontario, deeply “offended” Trump, Carney told journalists at a press conference in Gyeongju, South Korea on Saturday. He added he would not have approved its release had he been consulted.
The commercial aired earlier this month and spliced clips of Reagan’s 1987 speech on trade policy and his use of tariffs against Japan to suggest that the late Republican icon opposed protectionism. The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute accused Ontario of using the material without authorization and distorting Reagan’s record.
Trump reacted angrily, accusing the Canadians of “egregious behavior” and announcing the suspension of ongoing trade talks with Ottawa. He also imposed additional tariffs on Canadian imports in response.
The US president revealed on Friday that Carney had reached out to apologize and was “very nice,” though the talks remained suspended. “Ronald Reagan loved tariffs – and they tried to make it look the other way,” he said.
Carney’s remarks came after the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, which both leaders attended this week in South Korea.
Venezuela earlier this year accused the US president of plotting a coup, while Trump himself has floated the idea of overthrowing Iran’s leadership
US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard has acknowledged Washington’s history of regime change but said it ended under President Donald Trump – despite his recent remarks on Iran and accusations about Venezuela.
The US has long faced criticism for pursuing policies aimed at overthrowing governments under the banner of promoting democracy or protecting national interests – from Iraq in 2003 and Libya in 2011 to backing “color revolutions” such as Ukraine’s 2014 Maidan coup. Speaking at the 21st Manama Dialogue in Bahrain on Saturday, Gabbard claimed that, unlike its predecessors, the Trump administration prioritizes diplomacy and mutual deals over coups.
“The old Washington way of thinking is something we hope is in the rearview mirror and something that has held us back for too long: for decades, our foreign policy has been trapped in a counterproductive and endless cycle of regime change or nation building,” she stated, describing it as a “one-size-fits-all approach” of toppling regimes, imposing US governance models, and intervening in “poorly understood” conflicts, only to “walk away with more enemies than allies.”
Gabbard said the strategy drained trillions of US taxpayer dollars, cost countless lives, and fueled new security threats, but noted that Trump was elected “to put an end to this.”
“And from day one, he has showed a very different way to conduct foreign policy, one that is pragmatic, that is deal-driven,” she said. “This is what President Trump’s America First policy looks like in action – building peace through diplomacy.”
Since his inauguration in early 2025, Trump has repeatedly portrayed himself as a global peacemaker, boasting of brokering international deals and saying he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. Critics, however, argue his pressure campaigns on Venezuela and Iran mirror Washington’s regime-change playbook.
Caracas last month accused the US of plotting a coup against President Nicolas Maduro under the guise of its ongoing anti-drug campaign off the country’s coast. Trump himself hinted at “regime change” in Iran after US strikes in June, posting on truth Social: “Why wouldn’t there be a Regime change???” Tehran, which has long accused Washington of trying to destabilize it through sanctions and covert actions, denounced the strikes as proof of renewed efforts to undermine its government.
Derek Huffman has been granted a Russian passport after taking part in the Ukraine military operation
A US national who fought alongside Russian forces in the Ukraine conflict has thanked President Vladimir Putin after being granted Russian citizenship.
Derek Huffman told TASS that he applied for citizenship just before joining the Russian Army and learned that his application had been approved while he was on vacation. His family will also be applying for citizenship.
“I want to thank President Putin, the country of Russia, the Russian people who have been so supportive of me and my family and welcomed us with open arms, and just want to say thank you,” he told the outlet.
Huffman, along with his wife and their three daughters, moved to Russia from the US in March 2025. In an interview with RT in May, he said the family decided to leave the US to raise their children away from what he called the pervasive LGBTQ propaganda.
He explained that the idea of moving to Russia came to him after visiting Moscow in 2023. “The city turned out to be cleaner, safer, and more orderly than we could have imagined,” he said, adding: “the most important thing is that we found a place where our values were respected and where we felt at home.”
Shortly after moving to Moscow, Huffman signed a contract with the Russian Defense Ministry, saying he wanted to make a “contribution and earn our place here by enlisting in the Russian army.” He said his goal is to fully assimilate into Russian life, obtain citizenship, and build a future for his family in the country.
Huffman and his family are among a growing number of Western people who have moved to Russia in recent years. In August 2024, Putin signed a decree allowing foreigners who share Russia’s “traditional values” and disagree with the “neoliberal” principles imposed by their governments to apply for residence under a simplified procedure. Since the decree came into force in September 2024, the authorities have received over 1,150 applications
One firm’s aircraft reportedly missed targets during military trials while another company skipped them entirely
The German military is moving ahead with contracts worth €900 million ($1.05 billion) for kamikaze drones, even though some of the systems failed crucial field tests or were not tested at all, according to media reports published on Friday.
The prospective deals involve three German companies – Stark, Helsing, and Rheinmetall – and form part of a broader plan to bolster the Bundeswehr’s unmanned aerial capabilities, according to the Financial Times.
Bild, however, cited defense sources who described a problematic test held in late October at a training range near Munster. During the trials, two drones supplied by the startup Stark failed to hit their intended targets. One reportedly missed by more than 150 meters, while another crashed into nearby woodland. Rheinmetall, a traditional arms manufacturer and new entrant to the drone market, reportedly did not participate in the evaluation at all.
According to the FT, Stark, which was founded in late 2024 and backed by billionaire investor Peter Thiel, Sequoia Capital, and NATO’s Innovation Fund, had also taken part in British Army trials in Kenya this month, where its drones similarly failed to strike their targets.
“It was a disaster for Stark,” one source briefed on the German trials told the outlet. “They’ve been overselling [their capabilities] and are now paying the price.”
Despite the setbacks, both Stark and Rheinmetall were selected to receive €300 million contracts each just days after the Munster test, Bild said. Final approval from the German parliament is still pending, but additional evaluations are expected.
The procurement effort is part of a wider EU push for rapid militarization under the justification of preparing for a potential confrontation with Russia – an argument Moscow dismisses as false and a distraction from Europe’s internal woes.
German defense companies, along with other Western arms producers, have seen record profits since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict and the EU’s open-ended commitment to continue arming Kiev “for as long as it takes.”
A new memo reportedly lets commanders overrule decisions on trans soldiers retention and enforces birth-sex uniforms at hearings
A new Pentagon memorandum curtails the ability of transgender and non-binary US military personnel to challenge their dismissals, AP has reported.
The memo follows an order by US President Donald Trump directing the Department of War to bar anyone with a current or past diagnosis of gender dysphoria from enlisting or continuing service. A related Pentagon directive in February drew legal challenges, but the Supreme Court in May allowed the ban to proceed. Dismissal hearings started soon thereafter. Under the policy, anyone with a history of gender-affirming surgery or hormone therapy is ineligible for service unless granted a waiver through separation boards – peer panels that decide whether personnel are able to continue serving or are discharged.
However, according to a new Pentagon document dated October 8 and published by AP on Friday, commanders can now override decisions by formerly independent separation boards on the issue, giving commanders the final say on dismissals.
The document, which AP sources said was circulated to troops only last week, also requires service members to appear at hearings in uniforms matching their birth-assigned gender, warning that non-compliance may count against them.
Advocates say the new policy strips transgender troops of procedural protections granted to other service members, whose separation board rulings remain final, and warn that the uniform requirement will prevent many from attending their hearings.
Pentagon assistant press secretary Riley Podleski declined to confirm the memo’s authenticity, saying, “As a matter of policy, the Department does not comment on ongoing litigation.”
Around 15,000 active US personnel are openly transgender, most of whom are on administrative leave pending separation board decisions. Many have challenged the ban under gender-dysphoria claims, and lower US courts are still reviewing its legality.
The ban on trans service members is part of a broader campaign by Trump to roll back DEI policies, restrict sex-change surgery, and directing all federal agencies to define sex strictly as “male” or “female” based on birth traits. The policy has effectively rescinded federal recognition of transgender identities across US military and civilian regulations.
There will be no special treatment for Budapest, which has asked to be exempt from sanctions on Russian oil, the US president has said
US President Donald Trump has dismissed Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s request to exempt Hungary from sanctions on Russian oil.
Orban said in an interview with Kossuth Radio on Friday he will try to persuade Trump during his upcoming visit to Washington to grant Hungary relief from the sanctions on Russian energy companies Rosneft and Lukoil, which supply oil to Central Europe.
The US blacklisted the two companies last week, alleging a lack of commitment by Moscow to the Ukraine peace process. Hungary has repeatedly stated that Russian oil and gas are vital to its energy security.
Questioned by journalists aboard Air Force One later in the day, Trump said Orban “has asked for an exemption, but we have not granted one.”
“He is a friend of mine,” he added, while suggesting that the journalists move on to other questions.
Orban told Kossuth Radio that, as a landlocked country, Hungary has no viable alternatives to Russian oil, and that replacing it would push the nation toward an economic crisis.
“We have to make the Americans understand this peculiar situation… if we want them to allow exemptions from the American sanctions against Russia,” he stated.
The Hungarian prime minister said he would bring a “large delegation” of ministers, economic officials, and security advisers to Washington on November 7 in order to finalize an economic cooperation package with the US. He stressed, however, that any deal would depend on continued access to Russian oil and gas.
Hungary, which has maintained a neutral stance on the Ukraine conflict, is also facing growing pressure within the EU to reduce its reliance on Russian energy, as the bloc plans to phase out oil and gas imports from the country by 2028.
Orban, a key Trump ally in the EU, visited the US several times during last year’s presidential campaign to support his candidacy. In recent months, he has praised the US president’s efforts to stop the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
President Vladimir Putin earlier described the US sanctions on Russian oil companies as an “unfriendly move,” but said they would not have a significant impact on the economy.
Kiev’s troops attempted to carry out a helicopter landing near a besieged location in Donbass, the Defense Ministry has said
The Russian military has prevented an attempt by Ukraine to deploy special forces near the encircled town of Krasnoarmeysk (Pokrovsk) in Donbass, the Defense Ministry in Moscow has said.
Western media outlets, including Reuters and The Economist, reported on Friday that Kiev had used a US-supplied Black Hawk helicopter to attempt to deploy elite troops to the eastern part of Krasnoarmeysk. The landing attempt was reportedly personally coordinated by the chief of Ukraine’s military intelligence service (HUR), Kirill Budanov.
The Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement on Saturday that “a helicopter landing by a HUR special operations forces group was prevented approximately 1km northwest of the outskirts of the town of Krasnoarmeysk in Russia’s Donetsk People’s Republic.”
All 11 elite Ukrainian troops who descended from the helicopter were “destroyed,” it added.
Last week, the chief of the Russian General Staff, Valery Gerasimov, reported to President Vladimir Putin that some 5,500 Ukrainian servicemen have been encircled in Krasnoarmeysk. Russian forces have also blocked another 5,000 troops in Dimitrov (Mirnograd) and Kupyansk, according to Gerasimov.
Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky earlier described the situation in Krasnoarmeysk as “difficult,” but denied any encirclement and accused Moscow of exaggerating its gains on the battlefield.
On Thursday, Putin said Moscow was ready to halt its offensive operations and allow Ukrainian and other foreign journalists to travel to the front line and “see with their own eyes” that Ukrainian troops are trapped in the three towns.
Kiev, however, barred media workers from making the trip, with Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesman Georgy Tikhy warning that visiting Krasnoarmeysk, Dimitrov, or Kupyansk would be “a violation of our legislation” that would have “long-term reputational and legal consequences.”
The Russian Defense Ministry has accused Kiev of lying to the Ukrainian people and the world about its military setbacks. By denying access to reporters, Zelensky’s government effectively acknowledged the “catastrophic situation” faced by its encircled troops, it added.
Madrid, however, continues to stop short of a formal apology
Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Manuel Albares has publicly acknowledged the suffering and injustice experienced by Mexico’s native peoples during colonization five centuries ago. The comments mark a rare admission from a Spanish official, although Madrid has stopped short of issuing a formal apology.
Spain’s conquest of Mexico began in 1519, when Hernan Cortes led an expedition that overthrew the Aztec Empire. Armed with superior weapons and aided by disease, the conquistadors decimated Indigenous populations as they seized land and resources. The colonizers sought gold and power in the New World, while pre-Columbian cultures were repressed and temples replaced by churches.
“There was injustice. It is fair to acknowledge it today and fair to regret it, because that is also part of our shared history, and we cannot deny or forget it,” Albares said during the opening of a display devoted to Indigenous Mexican art in Madrid. He emphasized the “pain and injustice towards the Indigenous peoples to whom this showcase is dedicated.”
The exhibition, titled ‘Half of the World. Women in Indigenous Mexico’, was organized at the request of Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.
Responding to Albares’s remarks, Sheinbaum said it was “the first time that a member of the Spanish government has expressed regret over the injustices committed.” She called the gesture significant, saying that recognizing historical wrongs does not weaken nations but strengthens them.
“It is not humiliating,” she said. “On the contrary, acknowledging history, recognizing grievances, asking for forgiveness or expressing regret, and reclaiming that past as part of our story empowers governments and peoples.”
In 2019, then-Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador sent a letter to Spain’s King Felipe VI demanding an apology for the abuses committed during the 1519-1521 conquest and the centuries of colonial rule that followed. The request was rejected by Spain’s Foreign Ministry, which said both countries should view their past as a “shared history.” King Felipe did not publicly respond, and the exchange strained relations between Madrid and Mexico City for years.
Lawmakers are reportedly trying to ensure that the Epstein-linked royal is permanently barred from inheriting the throne
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing pressure from members of Parliament to support a measure that would permanently remove ex-Prince Andrew, the disgraced brother of King Charles III, from the royal line of succession, The Telegraph reported on Friday.
Several MPs have argued that any possibility of Andrew ascending the throne must be eliminated following the recent decision to strip him of his titles and privileges. The move came amid long-standing allegations of sexual misconduct linked to his friendship with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Andrew has denied accusations that he sexually assaulted a 17-year-old girl trafficked to him by the late financier.
Andrew is currently eighth in line to the British throne, after Prince William, his three children, Prince Harry, and Harry’s two children. Under UK law, any change to the royal succession requires an act of Parliament, which must also be endorsed by the legislatures of other Commonwealth realms recognizing the monarch as head of state.
“In the event of an unimaginable family catastrophe, Andrew could still inherit the throne,” Labour MP Jon Trickett told The Telegraph. “The British people would never accept that – this issue must be resolved once and for all.”
Independent MP Rachael Maskell added that “whatever the likelihood of such an occurrence, it would be appropriate to remove him from the line of succession and revoke his status as counsellor of state,” referring to the position that allows him to act on the King’s behalf in certain circumstances. Buckingham Palace has said Andrew will not be called upon to fulfill any such duties.
Public opinion strongly backs the recent disciplinary measures. In a YouGov poll conducted this week, 79% of respondents support stripping Andrew of his titles and evicting him from the Royal Lodge near Windsor Castle, compared to just 6% who oppose the decision. More than half say King Charles handled the matter appropriately, while 58% say the royal family acted too slowly.
