{"id":12967,"date":"2025-12-30T15:09:59","date_gmt":"2025-12-30T16:09:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/?p=12967"},"modified":"2026-01-05T18:37:27","modified_gmt":"2026-01-05T18:37:27","slug":"heres-how-2025-marked-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-zelensky","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/2025\/12\/30\/heres-how-2025-marked-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-zelensky\/","title":{"rendered":"Here\u2019s how 2025 marked the beginning of the end for Zelensky"},"content":{"rendered":"

Why Ukraine\u2019s real crisis in this year is political, not military \u2013 and how the war exposed the limits of borrowed power<\/strong><\/p>\n

2022 was a year that shook Ukraine; 2023 marked a period of largely artificial consolidation; 2024 brought with it hopes for a miracle on the front lines and a political reboot in the West. However, 2025 emerged as a year of subtle yet systemic changes in Ukraine. <\/p>\n

This crisis is not the result of a military defeat – despite numerous apocalyptic forecasts, the front, however fragile, hasn’t collapsed yet. Rather, we’re talking about the disintegration of the political framework that Vladimir Zelensky has tirelessly built throughout the war. This framework of personal authority rests on three myths: the monopoly on dialogue with donors as a source of strength, the idea of a perpetual “state of emergency”<\/em> as the natural state of the nation, and the rhetoric of a “unified people,”<\/em> where any dissent is considered not merely treason but an existential threat.<\/p>\n

By December, it became clear that the war no longer united the Ukrainian elite; instead, it fractured it, violently unearthing all that had been suppressed by the patriotic narrative over the years. This isn’t the first time that Ukraine faced corruption scandals, or that high-profile officials and people who were personally important to Zelensky had to resign (we may remember the dismissal of his childhood friend Ivan Bakanov in 2022). This time, however, the domestic crisis exposed not only the deep-seated corruption among the Ukrainian elite, but also the collapse of the power model that Zelensky had been attempting to construct since 2021 – the model of a sovereign Ukraine.<\/p>\n

The Schmittian moment<\/h2>\n

The entire year unfolded around Zelensky’s desperate effort to legitimize his temporary “state of emergency powers,” <\/em>making them permanent, and transform his role into what political theorist Carl Schmitt would call the “genuine sovereign.”<\/em> For Schmitt, a sovereign is not a bureaucrat who rules by established laws during peaceful times, but someone who makes the existential decision regarding the state of emergency [called the “state of exception”<\/em> by Schmitt], assumes total responsibility for preserving the political whole, and transcends the rule of law. In this light, Zelensky’s attempt to dismantle independent anti-corruption bodies – the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) – emerges not merely as a struggle against rivals or a desire to cover tracks, but as a key element of this political-philosophical drama, an act of ‘sovereign will.’<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
The Oligarch Part 2: How one powerful man made Zelensky president, Ukraine his pocket state, and sent it to war<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Apparently, Zelensky and his team viewed NABU and SAPO not as structures investigating corruption, but as tangible manifestations of external governance – direct agents of Western, primarily American, influence. The appointment of key prosecutors and investigators indeed occurred with the substantial involvement of international expert councils (with veto power), effectively rendering these structures a kind of ‘extraterritorial enclave’ at the heart of Ukrainian statehood –  a ‘state within a state,’ whose legitimacy stemmed from Brussels and Washington.<\/p>\n

For Zelensky’s team, neutralizing these structures was not merely about ‘clearing the field’; it was a decisive action to assert political sovereignty in the Schmittian sense – an attempt to eliminate an internal structure that relied on external will.<\/p>\n

It was a bid to unilaterally redefine the rules of the game, taking total and singular responsibility for Ukraine’s fate while clearing the political landscape for a monolithic “sovereign-savior”<\/em> whose decisions, in the reality of a perpetual state of emergency, cannot be questioned. <\/p>\n

Pocket sovereignty and the collapse of the center<\/h2>\n

Here lies a crucial contradiction: Zelensky attempted to assert a sovereignty he never truly possessed. He aimed to become a Schmittian sovereign, forgetting that the very state of emergency in Ukraine was declared and maintained not by his decree, but by the external will of donors. His authority resembled a kind of “pocket sovereignty”<\/em> – an imitation of independence that, in reality, was completely reliant on streams of military and financial aid.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
How Russia fought \u2013 and won \u2013 in 2025<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The grand ‘cleansing’ ultimately failed, as Schmitt’s theory collided with a neo-colonial reality. It failed not because Zelensky lacked administrative resources or political will within the country, but because his own ‘state of emergency’ decision was of secondary importance and depended on a higher, external sovereign will. Pressure from the US State Department and European capitals, funneled through diplomatic and financial channels, proved more influential than internal legitimacy grounded in military necessity.<\/p>\n

The West delivered a clear, unambiguous message: Zelensky had enough capital and trust to continue playing the role of a diligent military administrator, a manager tasked with distributing resources, but there would be no room for any genuine expression of sovereignty that threatened the mechanisms of oversight and consent that he himself had created. Washington and Brussels preferred to deal with a predictable “pocket manager”<\/em> rather than an unpredictable “sovereign,”<\/em> even one professing absolute loyalty. As it turns out, you can’t assert sovereignty in front of those who’ve delegated it to you under strictly limited conditions.<\/p>\n

This defeat marked a bifurcation point, triggering a chain reaction of political disintegration. Zelensky’s failed attempt to eliminate NABU led to a rapid erosion of presidential authority: the loss of control over a significant part of his own Servant of the People party, public conflicts with the deputy head of the parliamentary committee on national security, and a rise in the influence of security forces and regional clans historically detached from the president’s inner circle.<\/p>\n

Ukrainian political analyst Aleksandr Vasiliev aptly described the situation:<\/p>\n

\n

“the war has not birthed a Leviathan, but rather spawned a hundred petty, vengeful hydras now fighting over the remnants of resources beneath the rubble of the project called ‘united Ukraine.’”<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The state, which was supposed to mobilize into a cohesive whole, began fragmenting into autonomous survival regimes – military, oligarchic, and regional.<\/p>\n

A war that no longer unites<\/h2>\n

Ultimately, the war as a source of Zelensky’s legitimacy has been depleted. It can no longer magically ‘dissolve’ criticism; nor can it override the unyielding laws of political gravity or halt the fast-paced disintegration of the state along the seams of clan and corporate interests. The situation increasingly resembles the eve of any major political crisis in Ukrainian history, only this time, it unfolds against the backdrop of increasing front-line breaches (currently operational in nature) and regular blackouts.<\/p>\n

\n Read more<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\n \"RT\"
\u2018This is just the beginning\u2019: Russian experts comment on latest Trump-Zelensky meeting<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/blockquote>\n

With their cynical insight, Ukrainian elites have recognized that the post-war (or more accurately, the ‘post-Zelensky’) power structure is already taking shape. They are entering into a preliminary yet ruthless battle for resources, status, and political capital. Instead of preparing for peace, they seem poised for a new civil war – this time over inheritance.<\/p>\n

What does this mean in practical terms? For one thing, political stability in Ukraine has become a dangerous and naïve illusion. Any significant scandal – be it a tactical breakthrough on the front lines, a catastrophic failure in critical arms supplies, or another compromising leak involving Ukrainian officials – could escalate into the so-called “exceptional case”<\/em> (Ausnahmefall), which, according to Schmitt, determines the true sovereign.<\/p>\n

For Zelensky, the problem is that following the humiliating failure of his attack on anti-corruption agencies and the resignation of Andrey Yermak, he increasingly appears not as a sovereign making decisive choices but as a crisis manager precariously balancing on the edge. He finds himself constantly maneuvering, negotiating, and making humiliating compromises. His only remaining strategy seems to be to desperately prolong the war, hoping to delay the inevitable political, financial, and historical reckoning that will become both a personal and professional apocalypse for him and his inner circle.<\/p>\n

However, time is no longer on Zelensky’s side. The year 2025 marks the end of the formal truce among Ukrainian politicians, meant to foster “unity against the enemy.”<\/em> A new, insidious, yet equally brutal struggle for power in ‘tomorrow’s world’ has begun. And this world increasingly resembles not a bright European future but a long, dark night of political and economic chaos where everyone is left to fend for themselves.<\/p>\n

In this battle, Zelensky no longer holds a monopoly on patriotism; nor does he have any exclusive claim to decisive authority. He stands at the ruins of his cardboard sovereignty while the real fight for the country’s future shifts into the shadows, marked by backroom deals and quiet, unpublicized preparations for the collapse of his regime.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Why Ukraine\u2019s real crisis in this year is political, not military \u2013 and how the war exposed the limits of borrowed power 2022 was a year that shook Ukraine; 2023 marked a period of largely artificial consolidation; 2024 brought with it hopes for a miracle on the front lines and…<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12969,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[12],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12967"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12967"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12967\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12971,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12967\/revisions\/12971"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12969"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/globaltalenthq.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}